10 GA4 Best Practices for 2026 (Plus a Bonus That Changes Everything)
- Brady Hancock

- Jan 1
- 7 min read
Google Analytics 4 is no longer “new.” By 2026, GA4 is widely adopted — and that means the gap between well-implemented GA4 properties and messy, unreliable ones is wider than ever.
I see it every single day:
Over-tracked events, underutilized reports, misconfigured settings, and teams making decisions based on incomplete or misleading data.
The good news? A clean, scalable GA4 setup doesn’t require tracking everything — it requires tracking the right things, the right way, with systems built to evolve as your business grows. Below are 10 GA4 best practices for 2026, followed by a bonus strategy that future-proofs your measurement stack.
1. Use Google Tag Manager to Deploy GA4

Tagging setups that rely on scattered scripts, hard-coded events, or one-off implementations simply don’t scale.
Using Google Tag Manager (GTM) to deploy your GA4 configuration (Google tag) and your event tags creates a single, centralized layer for managing measurement across your site.
This centralized approach allows you to:
Update GA4 scripts without code deployments
Adjust tagging deployment quickly as requirements change
Roll out fixes across the entire site in minutes, not weeks
Maintain consistency across pages, templates, and components
Instead of hunting through source code or coordinating multiple releases, GTM becomes the control center for your analytics.
2. Create Custom Dimensions for Contextual Event Data

Events alone rarely answer real business questions. In an audit today, I saw over 70 custom events, with 13 marked as key events — many of which were tracking slight variations of the same interaction. While the tracking effort was substantial, the lack of contextual dimensions made the data harder to analyze, maintain, and trust.
This is where custom dimensions matter.
Instead of creating a new event for every variation, custom dimensions allow you to capture meaningful context within a smaller, more intentional set of events.
How This Works in Practice
Let’s use a simplified version of what we saw in today’s audit.
Rather than tracking separate events like:
form_submit_retail
form_submit_commercial
form_submit_corporate
form_submit_spanish
form_submit_english
You can track one core event (e.g. form_submit) and attach custom dimensions that describe what actually happened.
This keeps your event model clean while dramatically increasing reporting flexibility.
Example: Event-Scoped Custom Dimension
Use case: Understanding what type of interaction occurred
Event: form_submit
Event-scoped custom dimension: form_type
Example values:
retail
commercial
corporate
Why this matters:
Instead of maintaining multiple near-duplicate events, you can analyze:
Conversion rates by form type
Lead volume by business line
Funnel performance by form category
…all from a single, consistent event.
Example: User-Scoped Custom Dimension
Use case: Understanding who is interacting with your site
User-scoped custom dimension: user_type
Example values:
anonymous
logged_in
admin
dealer
customer
Why this matters:
In the audit, internal users and test traffic were influencing engagement and conversion metrics.
A user-scoped dimension like user_type allows you to:
Filter internal or admin users out of reports
Compare behavior between logged-in vs anonymous users
Understand how different audience segments convert over time
Because this dimension persists across sessions, it provides far more insight than trying to infer user intent from individual events.
3. Track Key Events Using Custom Event Tags

GA4 allows you to create events directly in the interface by modifying or deriving them from existing events. While this can be useful for quick, temporary needs, in-platform events are limited and fragile — especially as your site and tracking requirements grow.
For high-value interactions, custom event tags deployed through Google Tag Manager are the superior approach.
The Core Difference
In-platform events are reactive. They manipulate data after GA4 has already received it.
Custom event tags are proactive. They define exactly what gets sent to GA4 in the first place.
That difference matters more than most teams realize.
A. Precision: You Control When the Event Fires
In-platform events rely on:
Existing events
Simple conditions (URL contains, parameter equals, etc.)
This often leads to false positives.
Example from audits we see constantly:
A GA4 event fires whenever a URL contains /thank-you.
Problems:
The page can be refreshed
The URL may load without a successful submission
The event may fire multiple times
With a custom event tag in GTM, you can:
Fire only after a confirmed submission
Validate the form response
Ensure the event fires once per interaction
This is the difference between tracking activity and tracking outcomes.
B. Context: Custom Event Tags Capture Richer Data
In-platform events are constrained by the parameters already being sent.
Custom event tags allow you to attach intentional context, such as:
Form ID and form type
Funnel stage
Business unit
Product or service category
User state at the time of action
Why this matters:
Without this context, teams often create multiple events to represent what is really just one action. Custom event tags let you track one core action and describe it properly — keeping your event model clean and scalable.
C. Maintainability: GTM Scales, In-Platform Events Don’t
In-platform events tend to accumulate quickly:
No visibility into dependencies
Poor naming conventions over time
Hard to audit or clean up
As sites change, these events quietly break or become misleading.
With GTM:
Event logic is visible and documented
Changes can be validated in preview mode
Updates can be rolled out site-wide in minutes
This matters when:
Page structures change
Forms are reused across templates
Conversion definitions evolve
4. Stick to One Data Stream Per Property

GA4 web data streams are designed to support:
Subdomains
Cross-domain tracking
A unified view of a single user experience
What they are not designed for is mixing fundamentally different products or user journeys into one property.
Example: Marketing Site + SaaS Web App
A common mistake we see is placing:
A top-of-funnel (TOF) marketing website
And a gated SaaS web application
into the same GA4 property and web data stream.
At first, this feels convenient. In reality, it creates long-term measurement problems.
Why This Is a Bad Idea
A marketing site and a SaaS web app serve very different purposes:
Marketing Website (TOF):
Anonymous users
Content consumption
Lead capture
High bounce rates by nature
Short sessions
SaaS Web App (Post-Signup):
Authenticated users
Feature usage
Retention and engagement
Long sessions
Product-driven KPIs
When these are combined in one GA4 property:
User counts become inflated and misleading
Engagement metrics lose meaning
Funnels blend incompatible behaviors
Attribution becomes harder to interpret
Reporting requires constant filtering to be usable
In short: the data becomes technically correct but strategically confusing.
What to Do Instead
The better approach is:
One GA4 property for the marketing website
A separate GA4 property for the SaaS web app
This allows each environment to:
Track metrics that actually matter
Use purpose-built event models
Maintain clean, interpretable reports
If cross-property analysis is needed, tools like BigQuery or downstream reporting can unify insights without polluting the source data.
5. Deploy an Internal Traffic Filter

Internal traffic is silent data pollution.
GA4 allows you to define internal traffic by:
IP address
Custom parameters (like user_type = admin)
Once defined, you can exclude this traffic using data filters in the GA4 admin panel.
This is especially important for businesses with:
Developers
Frequent site updates
Staging or QA environments
Filtering internal traffic early protects long-term data integrity.
6. Stay Away From Connected Site Tags

While Google recommends Connected Site Tags, they often introduce more problems than they solve.
They can:
Cause duplicate events
Obscure where measurement IDs are deployed
Complicate troubleshooting
If you’re following best practice and using a single web data stream, intentionally deploying one measurement ID per domain keeps ownership and data flow crystal clear.
7. Extend the Data Retention Window for Explorations

By default, GA4 only retains event-level data for 2 months for Explore reports — which is rarely enough.
Extend your data retention to the maximum 14 months to:
Analyze trends over time
Compare year-over-year performance
Support long-term marketing insights
Without this change, long term historical analysis in Explore reports will be limited to a short time period.
8. Enable Google Signals

When enabled, Google Signals allows GA4 to use aggregated, anonymized data from users who are signed into their Google accounts to enhance reporting and audience capabilities. This unlocks features that are otherwise unavailable in standard GA4 setups.
Google Signals enhances GA4 by enabling:
Improved cross-device tracking
Demographic insights
More robust remarketing audiences
When enabled, GA4 can associate activity with users signed into Google accounts, providing a more complete view of your audience across devices and sessions.
This doesn’t replace first-party strategy — but it meaningfully improves audience modeling when used responsibly.
9. Track What You Need (Not Everything You Can)
GA4’s event-based model makes it tempting to track everything, but that doesn’t mean you should.
Over-tracking interactions creates:
Noisy reports
Slower analysis
Confusion around what actually matters
Start with a measurement plan that defines:
Your KPIs
Your primary conversion paths
The decisions-making your data needs to support
Then build event tracking around those priorities. Quality beats quantity — every time.
10. Perform Quarterly GA4 Audits

Your analytics setup should evolve alongside your business.
Set a recurring quarterly audit to review areas such as:
Event tracking relevancy & accuracy
Property & data-stream setting
Custom dimensions
Consent management
New feature usability
Measurement planning
Regular audits prevent slow data decay and ensure GA4 reflects how your business operates today — not last year. Google continues to actively develop GA4 — rolling out new features, adjusting existing functionality, and changing how certain reports, settings, and integrations behave. While these updates often bring improvements, they can also subtly impact how your data is collected, interpreted, or reported.
Bonus: Server-Side Tagging (The Future-Proof Layer)

If GA4 best practices are the foundation, server-side tagging is the reinforcement.
Server-side tagging routes measurement data through a secure server you control before sending it to third-party platforms. This approach:
Reduces signal loss from ad blockers and browser restrictions
Strengthens data governance
Improves accuracy of attribution
Creates cleaner, more reliable analytics data
In 2026, server-side tagging is no longer a “nice to have” — it’s quickly becoming the standard for teams that care about data accuracy.
On average, ⅓ of all marketing signals are now impacted by intelligent tracking prevention, including data intended for GA4 and major advertising platforms like Google Ads and Meta . Without server-side tagging in place, traffic and conversions are routinely underreported.
A well-implemented server-side setup can be the difference between tracking 65–70% of conversions versus over 90%, dramatically improving confidence in analytics and attribution
Final Thoughts
Your GA4 property isn’t “broken” — but it can be unforgiving if you deviate from the best practices above.
Clean data requires intention, structure, and ongoing care. When GA4 is implemented thoughtfully, it becomes a powerful decision-making engine. When it’s rushed or overbuilt, it becomes noise.
At Measure Marketing Pro, we help teams build GA4 setups that scale — technically, strategically, and operationally — so data stays useful long after implementation.
If your GA4 property feels overwhelming, unreliable, or underutilized, it’s probably time for a reset.




Comments